By Christina Georgiou
The Weller building, which GEDP has agreed to purchase, is set to house a year-round, indoor, expanded version of the Easton Farmers' Market (EFM), as well as house the offices of GEDP and the programs the private non-profit corporation runs, including the Easton Main Street Initiative, the Easton Ambassadors, and the EFM. The Weller Center's offices would also be located on the second floor of the building for about a year, with the Weller foundation leasing back space for about a year, Weller representatives have said.
The grant, if the council votes in favor of it, would cover the entire purchase price of the vacant building, as well as some "soft costs" and preliminary construction funding, according to the resolution presented before the city council. The document indicates the selling price of the building has been agreed upon at $900,000.
The source of the grant to GEDP would be tax-exempt bonds issued by the City of Easton, the proposed resolution states.
While Gretchen Longenbach, who serves as both a city employee as its redevelopment authority director and as executive director for GEDP told city council the new farmers' market plan was a sound one, some board members said that while they support the new market, they were not convinced a grant from the city is a sound investment before having seen the non-profit's business plan and financial projections for the project.
Mayor Sal Panto said that while a pro forma document has not been presented to the city for review by GEDP, he's confident the grant would be a sound investment.
"I'm under the impression that doing this reduces (GEDP) reliance on city funding," he said.
But city solicitor William Murphy said while that might be true, there's no guarantee of it or of the new "Easton Public Market" being financially successful.
"We as the city have no control over how GEDP conducts its affairs," he noted. "The conditions upon which (the million dollars) is given is that it is non-refundable."
The City of Easton's current annual contribution to GEDP is $375,000, much of which is used to fund the Main Street, Ambassadors, and current farmers' market.
Longenbach said that while the grant would ultimately be likely to reduce the amount of funding GEDP relies upon from the city, that wouldn't happen for at least a few years, until the new market starts to show a definite profit.
While GEDP is a non-profit corporation, the Weller venture would not be tax-exempt due to the fact the organization will be renting space to for-profit small businesses, Longenbach said. She added that the project not being tax-exempt means if GEDP were to have to resort to a traditional loan or mortgage situation to pay for the building, it would not only have to start paying back the money immediately, but would also be subject to paying taxes and fees, raising the cost of the project.
"The only scenario under which we could use bond funds was this one," she said. "It also makes our construction loan a much more doable deal."
She added, "This particular structure has the best chance of success."
"My problem is I'm being asked to vote on a resolution that gives away a million dollars, and I've not seen any numbers. None," said Ruggles. "I can't do that responsibly."
Councilwoman El Warner also said she was uncomfortable with the situation.
"I want the market to happen, but I'm not comfortable handing over one million dollars in taxpayer dollars...While I'd like to give (the public) the market, I'm not sure it's in the top five things (they want)," Warner said.
"We could vote tonight, but I'd have to vote no," she said. "If you gave me two weeks, I might change my mind."
Longenbach said the project could still move forward with the delay, but warned further delays could imperil the plan to close the sale of the building in October.
"It's imperative, whether through a grant from the city or otherwise that we be able to move forward so we don't jeopardize that," she told council members.
While Panto agreed the request for more specific financial information and GEDP's business plan for the space was reasonable, he said he's personally satisfied with the little that's been presented so far, noting a lot of the information will be contingent on what happens after the building is purchased.
"My concerns on this were satisfied today," he said, adding that he feels the new market is the best use for the space. "That building is just too big to attract a private developer. I think it's a good project, and it has my full support."
Longenbach promised to deliver more specific information to council members in coming days, and the matter is expected to be discussed again at the city council committee meeting on Tuesday, Sept. 10, with the resolution set to be revisted at the council's next regular meeting on Wednesday, Sept. 11.
No comments:
Post a Comment